Re: Elektron Digitone
Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 9:36 am
I’ve modified LFO 1 so I think it now emulates the Digitone’s LFO modes correctly, although a certain amount of interpretation of the manual was involved! I left LFO 2 alone and arranged the additions to LFO 1’s schematic so you can see what I did (it’s not pretty!).
The main question I had was not answered in the manual, namely is the LFO monophonic or polyphonic? A mono one would modulate the chosen target in the same phase for all notes played, whereas a poly LFO would modulate each note from when it’s played. I chose to keep it poly for 2 reasons. One is that I think it’s more useful and secondly because a mono system would be a lot of work and re-triggering would sound wrong in my view, since it would affect any notes already sounding.
Modulating the green stepped ratios: It seems to me that developers these days think that everything should be a modulation target, even the effing algorithm! Maybe it’s expected by users, even though some targets will just sound crap when modulated. Also, as I’m sure you know, developers can do stuff in different ways than FlowStone is capable of. The review said that the stepped ratio thing sounded “zippered” but maybe it would be interesting or something. The core green binary processing was really involved and not made by me, so converting it all to stream would be a daunting task. However, I’ll give it some more thought. Maybe there’s a better algorithm which can be built in DSP (but I doubt it!).
Finally, I must mention the problem with using the BUS prims. If you want to make this available as 64 bit you need to know that it won’t work in FS4. Ages ago I documented the problem on Slack but it isn’t fixed yet. I found the issue when helping Johan and he had to change to multiplexors with wireless module outputs. Personally I prefer the multiplexor method because it’s easier to use Tab to find the sources and targets. In my opinion the Bus system is more about making a pretty schematic than improving functionality.
BTW I totally love the FlowTone name. Really clever!
The main question I had was not answered in the manual, namely is the LFO monophonic or polyphonic? A mono one would modulate the chosen target in the same phase for all notes played, whereas a poly LFO would modulate each note from when it’s played. I chose to keep it poly for 2 reasons. One is that I think it’s more useful and secondly because a mono system would be a lot of work and re-triggering would sound wrong in my view, since it would affect any notes already sounding.
Modulating the green stepped ratios: It seems to me that developers these days think that everything should be a modulation target, even the effing algorithm! Maybe it’s expected by users, even though some targets will just sound crap when modulated. Also, as I’m sure you know, developers can do stuff in different ways than FlowStone is capable of. The review said that the stepped ratio thing sounded “zippered” but maybe it would be interesting or something. The core green binary processing was really involved and not made by me, so converting it all to stream would be a daunting task. However, I’ll give it some more thought. Maybe there’s a better algorithm which can be built in DSP (but I doubt it!).
Finally, I must mention the problem with using the BUS prims. If you want to make this available as 64 bit you need to know that it won’t work in FS4. Ages ago I documented the problem on Slack but it isn’t fixed yet. I found the issue when helping Johan and he had to change to multiplexors with wireless module outputs. Personally I prefer the multiplexor method because it’s easier to use Tab to find the sources and targets. In my opinion the Bus system is more about making a pretty schematic than improving functionality.
BTW I totally love the FlowTone name. Really clever!