dream came true....

Thank you, time to digest the new changes, and let's start with the experiments and feedback.
P.S. in the commented module it still has some errors in the original clock connections.

right for correctness,
in the version commented in the second assembler code editor is missing this piece of code at the bottom

excuse Tulamide if I have not correctly clarified your question,
thank you very much KG with the comments now everything is clearer to me too,
I wondered if this would also work in poly-section, because if it has to be,
filter optimization must guarantee all four process channels,
ok experiment day ...

Martin, I say

In the code editor there is no call opcode,
it can be used in the assembler editor, and does not refer to a function loop.
With the call opcode you can re-call a sequence of byte code and execute it,
so now KG has found a way to store a function directly from the assembler code editor in a specific ...

3.0.8.1 crash test passed, all as notes expected.

KG, if it does not bother you,
could you add more comments to your code explaining what it does and why?
In this way we could understand and contribute.
thx

voodoo.png
well, I'm trying to figure out what this system really use,
there is a bit of voodoo in it?
if you try to connect the input of the oscillator directly to the downsampler module (the 10 pole filter),
then not using the output of the your code module in the first section,
it works the ...

ok, next step